The s Guitar Hero Series And King s Candy Crush Saga

Games, in one form or another, have existed for almost as long as the human race and despite the fact that they are often reduced to being something for children they are in fact quite complex. When analysing games one must look at why they are engaging – what keeps us playing – and how they foster participation in the average user. By comparing and contrasting the characteristics of Activision’s Guitar Hero series and King’s Candy Crush Saga, it will become apparent that the former is more engaging while the latter is more effective in fostering participation in players. Before one can begin to analyse games in terms of their engagement and participation qualities, a definition of what a game is and the characteristics that make them effective must be established. Koster defines games by saying they are, ‘iconic depictions of patterns in the world†¦games are puzzles to solve’ (2004, p. 34), indicating that games are simply non-threatening representations of reality designed to teach the player skills that they will first have to discover for themselves. According to Koster the skills games intend to teach are often, ‘things that we can absorb into the unconscious as opposed to things designed to be tackled by the conscious, logical mind’ (2004, P. 76) which is something that can be seen in both Guitar Hero and Candy Crush. On the surface, Guitar Hero is a game about being a rock star and playing music, but the way the game is played aims to improve hand-eye coordination

A child called “it” Free Essays

I don’t believe that anyone could read this book and not be disturbed it. It is a poignant and heart wrenching book of one child’s great misery at the hands of his extremely â€Å"ill† mother. The types of abuse that were inflicted upon him were horrific and terrifying to read about, let alone to have suffered through. We will write a custom essay sample on A child called â€Å"it† or any similar topic only for you Order Now I had to pause several times in the reading just to take a breath and try to absorb that anyone could have endured such horrors and survived it. It often brought me to tears and shock from the sheer sadness of it. David Pelzer’s writings were clear, concise, and held back no punches. At times, I felt myself filled with rage at the injustice and cruelty this man bore as a helpless child and the incredulity that it was permitted to go unchecked for so long. It seemed so inconceivable that no one interfered or made any attempt to stop it from family to public officials. This did not happen in the Dark Ages but in the 1970’s in California and in a country which was and is supposed to be a nation of freedom and enlightenment. How could the system have so totally and miserably failed this child? The â€Å"why† of that was still a mystery to me when I had reached the conclusion of the book? The only answer I could come up with was that no one could be bothered until it just finally became so evident that it could no longer be ignored. That, in itself, is almost as dire a tragedy as the misery and pain this child had to feel and live through. First question: A discussion of how this book impacted you emotionally and cognitively. The first real reaction I had was to the way the boy felt so unworthy in the beginning chapter of the book. This is a classic sign of child abuse, where it becomes the purpose of the abuser to demean and belittle the abused until they have no self confidence left or any sense of personal dignity. A human being that believes in themselves will fight back and refuse to be submissive. The mother’s constant spew of criticism was intended for just that purpose so that David would not try to oppose her and would suffer through her abuse without fighting her. It gave her a sense of power over him, ill regardless of the fact that she was an adult and he was a child where the physical odds were against him. As each stage of the abuse became more violent and degrading as well as life threatening, my shock grew the further I read into the book. At points, it was hard to believe that a mother could be so uncaring of her child. Her coldness and lack of guilt amazed me but David’s mental and emotional fight to preserve his sanity and survival awed me more. When she broke his arm was horrible but to make him suffer through the night just so she pass it off as a fall off a top bunk and therefore, in her mind, take away any risk that she might be held accountable for it, impressed upon me just what a callous coward she was. Yet that incident seemed to pale in the mockery of the stabbing where she simply bound his wounds and let him heal at home without any medical help. She knew if she took him to the hospital that there would questions and reactions and she would come under suspicion but in truth, the saddest and most despicable action came from his father when David turned to him for help and the man simply told him to go back and finish the dishes before the mother noticed. He let his child stand there and bleed on the carpet and did nothing. Why? Because he was afraid of his wife and her mouth! He put his comfort over the safety of his child and that is unbelievable that any loving parent would do that! I could better understand David’s siblings’ withdrawal out of fear of the mother but the father and the grandmother, both adults, failing to act in David’s defense was almost beyond comprehension. The malicious way that the mother taught her youngest son to view his older brother was feasible because a child, especially a very young one, reacts to the way they are taught. He was blameless in a way and more so than David’s older brothers. It brought forth the question to my mind as to why â€Å"just David† and not the other boys? Why were they allowed to eat and have privileges and David wasn’t? What was it about David that made his mother single him out as the one to be despised and abused? These were questions that the book never quite answered in my opinion. Of course, the book was written from the first person point of view, which of David and in only being a child, how would he know what caused his mother to turn on him and treat him so abominably? Second question: A discussion of the instances of where people could have stopped the maltreatment but did not. This question goes back to the instance of the father in particular. He was the only other adult in the house and it should have fallen on him to stop the abuse when it first began. Despite the fact that his wife hid the abuse from him in the beginning and made David never reveal it to his father, how could he have not noticed? With the mother denying the child food, the boy would have grown thinner and wan with an unusual lack of energy or vibrancy normal to a child David’s age. The father would have also had to see how the child clung to him when he was home. Then as time progressed and the father did openly admit to what was happening, why did he not stop it? If he had been a truly loving and caring parent, he would have taken immediate action to stop it, no matter how much he cared about his wife. He simply did not want to â€Å"rock the boat†, to use an old adage. He chose to ignore the situation and pretend that it was not happening. David was alone in a world that he was too small to be able to defend himself in. How to cite A child called â€Å"it†, Papers

Android Security VS Iphone Security

Question: Discuss about theAndroid Security VS Iphone Security. Answer: Introduction Recently, the world has seen the emergence of mobile computing whose sophistication has never been witnessed before. Most of the mobile phone makers have been making leaps and bounds in order to be ahead of their competitors in providing mobile phones and solutions geared towards fast adoption by customers. These mobile devices are highly technologically advanced that many of the functions performed on a computer can also be done on a mobile phone while still maintaining the same great user experience (Chittoria and Aggarwal, 2014:1). In the present market, the most renowned mobile devices are those running on Android operating system belonging to Google and those running on iOS belonging to Apple. Mobile applications have become integral and ubiquitous to our lives and therefore they have attracted the interest of unethical/criminal hackers who are interested in stealing information they come across in these mobile devices and their applications (Kaspersky Lab United States, 2016). Google and Apple have taken huge strides in creating various measures to ensure secure usage of mobile devices. This research report emphasizes on security of the mobile applications that run on the aforementioned operating systems. Security should always be considered in all phases of a mobile application life cycle which include stages such as development, publishing, installation and execution/usage of the application. It should start from the very first point of developing the application to the last stage which is execution. After execution, security must be checked at all times. Security Consideration Overview This report is subdivided into four parts which further elaborate on the security aspects in Android and iPhone. They are: Security at the time of developing the application. Security when publishing the application to the online stores of Android and iPhone. Security at the time of installation especially the features in both mobile operating systems. Security at the time of execution of the application on a users mobile phone Smart mobile devices are characterized by the capability to execute numerous and synchronized applications supporting diverse degrees of portability and modification and by supporting alternating distant service access and working according to limited resource constrictions (Susanto et al., 2016). This comes at a cost since security will have to be considered in the whole cycle of app execution, failure to which would see the application exposing its user to security attacks. Security at the Time of Developing the Application In an ideal world, it would be every application developers dream to create a bug free application with perfectly secure data storage and transmission (Das, Goswami and Bhunia, 2016: 1). Since there is nothing as a perfect application, bugs are bound to exist, with majority of them emerging at the time of application design and development due to a mistake or two, done by the software engineer or the individual responsible for developing an application. Consequences of these bugs include compromising of user data and sometimes injection of applications that execute illegal processes such as key logging. To achieve security in Android, the developer is responsible for isolating an application from other resources belonging to the system through a technique called sandboxing. A sandbox is firmly restricted environment where applications and programs can be executed. Sandboxes control what block or pieces of application code can do, thereby giving them as many permissions as they require without including extra permissions which could be misused (Howtogeek.com, 2016). Sandboxing in Android is usually controlled by each application. The application usually requires permission and approval in order for a continued access to resources the application needs. This improves and tightens security since each application has its own listing/directory and permissions per each active application (Holla and Katti, 2016:489). In iPhones iOS, sandboxing comprises of a set of fine-grained restrictions that bound the application access to the file system, network as well as the hardware of the device. It contains an extremely robust sandbox in which applications use the same sandbox with a higher protection and less access by other applications (Tabini, 2014). IPhone is more secure compared to android. This is because; iPhone permits access to the system file in the root and not phone settings. Android depends more on the user since the user usually is required to modify or set security for every application at the time of its installation. In android, storage can be built in or external which doesnt have permissions by default except for reading. Therefore, all applications are able to read data from the external storage automatically. An application may end up accessing unwanted code within the external storage thereby spreading viruses and malware. In iOS, the device doesnt have an external storage or memory and only contains fixed internal or built in storage. For an application to be accessed or manipulated, it must get permission from the data through the DPA (Data Protection APIs) that are inbuilt into the IOS core. This is then joined to a complex entry code that increases security of data in the operating system (Sheldon, 2013). Security when Publishing the Application to the Online Stores of Android and iPhone After the application have been completely developed and tested, it is now ready to be distributed to users. This is called publishing. This is popularly done through application stores hosted by Google for android or Apple for iOS with respect to which operating system an application have been built to run on. Application store for android is called Google Play and that for iOS, is called Apple store. To publish applications to the Google play store, the creator or developer is required to have access to the Googles Developer Console which is a set of tools which permit the developer in publishing and monitoring their applications (Play.google.com, 2016). However, Google play store is not the only place that one can place their application for download. A user can decide to install an application which has been emailed or downloaded from a website just by making modifications to a security setting that permits installation of android applications from unknown sources. This fails to provide security verification and in the process exposing a mobile phone to malware (Chittoria and Aggarwal, 2014:1). In iOS, the Xcode which is an integrated development environment (IDE) uses a signing identity mechanism in order to sign up an application when it is undergoing the build process. The signing identity usually has got a public and a private key paired together. The private key is used by cryptographic functions to fire up the signing of identity process while the public key helps to recognize the developer as the rightful owner of the both keys. Therefore, a developer can acquire developer certificates for purposes of public distribution and distribution certificates in order to submit to the Apple application store. This ensures that the operating system does not allow installation of applications from unauthorized sources. Security at the time of installation especially the features in both mobile operating systems The android operating system normally contains permissions for individual applications which are also the same for the iPhone operating system. In the android operating system, a list of permissions and resources required by the application in order to execute are displayed. During installation, the user usually selects a list of permissions he or she would like to be associated with a particular application. Permissions include read phone identity and state, internet access, automatically start or boot etc. however, a user only has two options; give all the permissions required by an application or simply not carry out the installation of the application. Again, it is up to the installers decision to consider the permissions while doing installation and allow them or deny them and abandon installation. Unfortunately, majority of users do not put into consideration these permissions and this is a form of security breach since some permissions may be harmful in the long run. IPhone has a different approach to application permissions during installation. No application permissions are asked during installation. Unlike in android where one has to give all permissions to be able to install or deny them and fail to install, iOS for iPhone only permits the most basic permissions to be authorized by the user. Therefore, at the time of installation, only the application is installed without any permissions having been granted. These permissions are authorized when a user is executing an application and it requires a certain resource to properly function. For example, after installing Google maps and not using it, there is zero permission associated with it. However, any attempt to use its mapping features throws a prompt to the user asking for permission to use the current location of the users device. This is more secure compared to android since one can deny this permission and then continue using the application in other manner with respect to its specificat ions. This shows that android is highly exposed to security breaches since one cannot make specific choices on permissions to allow or deny. Its either you allow all or deny all (Savvy Apps, 2016). Security at the Time of Execution of the Application on a users Mobile Phone It has been discussed above that iPhone requires app permissions during execution while android requires them during installation. For the iPhone, an application will execute only when permissions are authorized. This is because when an application execute, it requests for access to the necessary resources in order for it to give output to the user. The operating system prompts the user with the help of a dialog box whether they permit the application to use the resource it is demanding. IPhone also offers runtime security through a process referred to as code signing. This process prevents an unauthorized application from running on the mobile phone. In an android application, it is the responsibility of the developer to build and test the security of an application while it is executing. This is by following android best practices which include ensuring that the application is not performing insecure creation of files, listening to communications such as SMSes, improper storage of user and device data etc (developer.android.com, 2016). Root kits are more common in android than iPhone. These are malwares aimed at giving criminal hackers administrative access to a mobile phone (Schultz, 2008). Types of root kits include user mode root kits and kernel mode root kits. A hacker most coveted prize in the mobile sector is gaining root access to a mobile device. Root access is the process of having control of various android subsystems. If a mobile phone gets infected with a root kit, the owner of the root kit has all the permission to do what he wants in the mobile such as turning off safety features, install and deploy applications they want and even listening for communications and stealing data (Kassner, 2008). Conclusion In the table below, we provide a comparison of security for the applications in iPhone and Android based on the phase in which an application is currently in. Application phase Android IPhone During development Sandboxing in Android is usually controlled by each application. The application usually requires permission and approval in order for a continued access to resources the application needs. In iPhones iOS, sandboxing comprises of a set of fine-grained restrictions that bound the application access to the file system, network as well as the hardware of the device. This improves and tightens security since each application has its own listing/directory and permissions per each active application It contains an extremely robust sandbox in which applications use the same sandbox with a higher protection and less access by other applications During publishing The creator or developer is required to have access to the Googles Developer Console which is a set of tools which permit the developer in publishing and monitoring their applications. The Xcode which is an integrated development environment (IDE) uses a signing identity mechanism in order to sign up an application when it is undergoing the build process. The signing identity usually has got a public and a private key paired together. The private key is used by cryptographic functions to fire up the signing of identity process while the public key helps to recognize the developer as the rightful owner of the both keys. During installation List of permissions and resources required by the application in order to execute are displayed. During installation, the user usually selects a list of permissions he or she would like to be associated with a particular application. At the time of installation, only the application is installed without any permissions having been granted. These permissions are authorized when a user is executing an application and it requires a certain resource to properly function. During execution It is the responsibility of the developer to build and test the security of an application while it is executing. This is by following android best practices which include ensuring that the application is not performing insecure creation of files, listening to communications such as SMSes, improper storage of user and device data etc An application will execute only when permissions are authorized. This is because when an application execute, it requests for access to the necessary resources in order for it to give output to the user. The operating system prompts the user with the help of a dialog box whether they permit the application to use the resource it is demanding. It is every individuals responsibility, whether a user or a developer to ensure security of a device is maintained at all times failure to which both stand to lose. References Casteel, K., Derby, O. and Wilson, D. (2012). Exploiting common Intent vulnerabilities in Android applications. [online] Available at: https://css.csail.mit.edu/6.858/2012/projects/ocderby-dennisw-kcasteel.pdf [Accessed 22 Oct. 2016]. Chittoria, Y. and Aggarwal, N. (2014). Application Security in Android-OS VS IOS. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, [online] 4(5), p.1. Available at: https://www.ijarcsse.com/docs/papers/Volume_4/5_May2014/V4I5-0847.pdf. Das, M., Goswami, R. and Bhunia, C. (2016). Implementation of New Method to Generate a Key in Automatic Variable Key for Perfect Security. IJSIA, 10(4), pp.1. developer.android.com (2016). Best Practices for Security Privacy | Android Developers. [online] Developer.android.com. Available at: https://developer.android.com/training/best-security.html [Accessed 22 Oct. 2016]. Goetsch, S. (2016). Secure Mobile Development Best Practices. [online] NowSecure. Available at: https://www.nowsecure.com/ebooks/secure-mobile-development-best-practices/#viaforensics [Accessed 22 Oct. 2016]. Hill, S. (2012). Android app security basics: Easy ways to keep your phone safe. [online] Digitaltrends.com. Available at: https://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/android-app-security-basics/#ixzz33JTbRJ3U [Accessed 22 Oct. 2016]. Hoffman, C. (2013). iOS Has App Permissions, Too: And Theyre Arguably Better Than Androids. [online] Howtogeek.com. Available at: https://www.howtogeek.com/177711/ios-has-app-permissions-too-and-theyre-arguably-better-than-androids/ [Accessed 22 Oct. 2016]. Holla, S. and Katti, M. (2016). Android Based Mobile Application Development and its Security. International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology, [online] 3(3), p.489. Available at: https://www.ijcttjournal.org/Volume3/issue-3/IJCTT-V3I3P130.pdf. Howtogeek.com. (2016). Sandboxes Explained: How Theyre Already Protecting You and How to Sandbox Any Program. [online] Available at: https://www.howtogeek.com/169139/sandboxes-explained-how-theyre-already-protecting-you-and-how-to-sandbox-any-program/ [Accessed 21 Oct. 2016]. Kaspersky Lab United States. (2016). Kaspersky Personal Family Security Software. [online] Available at: https://usa.kaspersky.com/internet-security-center/threats/android-vs-iphone-mobile-security#.WAmeKeh97Dd [Accessed 21 Oct. 2016]. Kassner, M. (2008). 10+ things you should know about rootkits - TechRepublic. [online] TechRepublic. Available at: https://www.techrepublic.com/blog/10-things/10-plus-things-you-should-know-about-rootkits/ [Accessed 22 Oct. 2016]. Play.google.com. (2016). [online] Available at: https://play.google.com/apps/publish/signup/ [Accessed 22 Oct. 2016]. Sacco, A. (2008). Six Essential Apple iPhone Security Tips. [online] PCWorld. Available at: https://www.pcworld.com/article/152128/iphone_security.html [Accessed 22 Oct. 2016]. System Permissions | Android Developers. [online] Developer.android.com. Available at: https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/security/permissions.html [Accessed 22 Oct. 2016]. Savvy Apps. (2016). How to Create Better User Permission Requests in iOS Apps. [online] Available at: https://savvyapps.com/blog/how-to-create-better-user-permission-requests-in-ios-apps [Accessed 21 Oct. 2016]. Shah, K. (n.d.). Top 10 iPhone Security Tips. [online] Santa Clara: McAfee. Available at: https://www.mcafee.com/us/resources/white-papers/foundstone/wp-top-10-iphone-security-tips.pdf [Accessed 22 Oct. 2016]. Schultz, E. (2008). Rootkits: The Ultimate Malware Threat. [online] Infosectoday.com. Available at: https://www.infosectoday.com/Articles/Rootkits.htm [Accessed 22 Oct. 2016]. Sheldon, R. (2013). How Apple iOS encryption and data protection work. [online] Search Mobile Computing. Available at: https://searchmobilecomputing.techtarget.com/tip/How-iOS-encryption-and-data-protection-work [Accessed 21 Oct. 2016]. Source.android.com. (n.d.). Security | Android Open Source Project. [online] Available at: https://source.android.com/security/ [Accessed 22 Oct. 2016]. Susanto, H., Almunawar, M., Leu, F. and Chen, C. (2016). Android vs iOS or Others? SMD-OS Security Issues. International Journal of Technology Diffusion, 7(2), pp.1-18 Tabini, M. (2014). Why Apple should open up the iOS sandbox. [online] Macworld. Available at: https://www.macworld.com/article/2148362/how-inter-app-communication-on-ios-could-benefit-users.html [Accessed 21 Oct. 2016].

Prison Inmates, Are Some Of The Most Maladjusted People In Society. Mo

Prison inmates, are some of the most "maladjusted" people in society. Most of the inmates have had too little discipline or too much, come from broken homes, and have no self-esteem. They are very insecure and are "at war with themselves as well as with society" (Szumski 20). Most inmates did not learn moral values or learn to follow everyday norms. Also, when most lawbreakers are labeled criminals they enter the phase of secondary deviance. They will admit they are criminals or believe it when they enter the phase of secondary deviance (Doob 171). Next, some believe that if we want to rehabilitate criminals we must do more than just send them to prison. For instance, we could give them a chance to acquire job skills; which will improve the chances that inmates will become productive citizens upon release. The programs must aim to change those who want to change. Those who are taught to produce useful goods and to be productive are "likely to develop the self-esteem essential to a normal, integrated personality" (Szumski 21). This kind of program would provide skills and habits and "replace the sense of hopelessness" that many inmates have (Szumski 21). Moreover, another technique used to rehabilitate criminals is counseling. There is two types of counseling in general, individual and group counseling. Individual counseling is much more costly than group counseling. The aim of group counseling is to develop positive peer pressure that will influence its members. One idea in many sociology text is that group problem-solving has definite advantages over individual problem-solving. The idea is that a wider variety of solutions can be derived by drawing from the experience of several people with different backgrounds. Also one individuals problem might have already been solved by another group member and can be suggested. Often if a peer proposes a solution it carries more weight than if the counselor were to suggest it (Bennett 20-24). Further, in sociology, one of the major theories of delinquency is differential association (Cressey 1955). This means some people learned their ways from "undesirable" people who they were forced to be in association with and that this association "warps" their thinking and social attitudes. "Group counseling, group interaction, and other kinds of group activities can provide a corrective, positive experience that might help to offset the earlier delinquent association" (Bennett 25). However, it is said that group counseling can do little to destroy the power of labeling (Bennett 26). The differential-association theory emphasizes that a person is more likely to become a criminal if the people who have the greatest influence upon them are criminals (Doob 169). Most of today's correctional institutions lack the ability and programs to rehabilitate the criminals of America. One can predict that a prisoner held for two, four, eight or ten years, then released , still with no education or vocational skills will likely return to a life of crime. Often their life in crime will resume in weeks after their release. Although the best prisons and programs in the world will not cure the problem totally, improvements still must be made (Szumski 20). Prison inmates, are some of the most "maladjusted" people in society. Most of the inmates have had too little discipline or too much, come from broken homes, and have no self-esteem. They are very insecure and are "at war with themselves as well as with society" (Szumski 20). Most inmates did not learn moral values or learn to follow everyday norms. Also, when most lawbreakers are labeled criminals they enter the phase of secondary deviance. They will admit they are criminals or believe it when they enter the phase of secondary deviance (Doob 171). Next, some believe that if we want to rehabilitate criminals we must do more than just send them to prison. For instance, we could give them a chance to acquire job skills; which will improve the chances that inmates will become productive citizens upon release. The programs must aim to change those who want to change. Those who are taught to produce useful goods and to be productive are "likely to develop the self-esteem essential to a normal, integrated personality" (Szumski 21). This kind of program would provide skills and habits and "replace the

buy custom Colonial Identities and the Sociedad de Castas essay

buy custom Colonial Identities and the Sociedad de Castas essay Stuart B. Schwartz in his work Colonial Identities and the Sociedad de Castas emphasizes such concepts as race and class tracing their functional influences on the multi-racial and multi-ethnic societies of colonial Latin America.Also, the researcher makes attempts to both detect possible changes in respect of the aforementioned phenomena and investigate the direct causes of such changes. To the authors point of view, most of researchers strive to measure the motifs and changes regarding the multi-racial and multi-ethnic societies by accentuating on the institute of marriage or sexual unions. In other words, the unions of endogamy or exogamy are frequently investigated in order to answer the aforesaid question. Contrary to other scholars, Schwartz is disposed to think that the concept of sociedad de castas as well as the society of orders has been a juridical and ideological constituent which makes impact on marriage, work and other integral parts of social life while constructing an interweaving part of it as well.According to Swartz, an intensifying concern with issues of identity and social definition proves the reliability of the aforementioned approach. Thus, a wide range of researchers convict that the racial category of sociedad de castas is not utterly dependent on the biological criterion but also embodies specific social designators. In addition, the term caste should be apprehended as a biologically social entity solidified by various life experiences including baptism, marriage and living arrangements. Also, a mental note should be made that the colonial polity has often granted peculiar privileges and statuses to certain groups of people. In view of the above, it is possible to presume that many people are reluctant to disclose their true biological identity in order to either occupy or retain particular positions in the colonial society. Hence, the representatives of different castes should not be differentiated solely on the biological grounds. Moreover, Schwartz states that analysis of the castes system not as a fixed structure but as a historical process brings no ubiquitous knowledge. To the authors point of view, not marriages but unions with Indian women have given birth to a generation of mestizo children accepted as Spaniards.Such unions have been considered manifestations of both passion and strategy. In accordance with Schwartzs narration, the idea of lineage being dependent on blood plays a very crucial role in discerning between various castes. Apart from the above, the researcher seeks to investigate whether the multi-ethnic societies of colonial Latin America have been organized by racial principles as well.As far as the notion of legitimacy is concerned, it should be conceded that the colonial society incorporaes legitimacy and recognition as the significant factors. Nevertheless, the impact of legitimacy and recognition on the issue of race, and vice versa, is undisclosed. As the foregoing discussion must suggest, legitimacy and recognition have obviously been the primary markers for the first generations. However, in Spanish American centers by 1560 the social status of mestizos within colonial society has been diminished due to a sequence of local, demographic and historical circumstances. As far as the concept of race is concerned, it should be asserted that the demography is represented as a fairly important factor for the first generation of multi-ethnic societies in colonial Latin America. According to Schwartz, Spanish have given preference to marriages with European women when available. Otherwise, Spaniards have accepted mestizas as Europeans or members of aboriginal noble and ruling families. At any rate, Spanish people have preferred mestizas to Indians. Therefore, it should be supposed that the factor of race remains, in Schwartzs opinion, the most advantageous way to understand the patterns of multi-ethnic societies in colonial Latin America. In the final analysis, the author suggests that the factor of gender has genuinely affected the functioning of colonial society in Latin America by means of controlling and representing the sexuality and domestic arrangements as undeniable parts of the Spanish governance; but the aforesaid factor should not be apprehended as an independent variable After everything has been given due consideration, it is possible to outline the chief strengths and limitations of the analyzed study. In this connection, it should be asserted that the studys benefits are the following: The author endeavors to juxtapose the sociedad de castas with juridical and ideological system of society which has the direct nexus with marriage, work and other forms of social subsistence. It should be agreed that the colonial society with various hierarchies within it may be comprehended through analysis of its values, perceptual identities and ideology. Therefore, it is possible to claim that the correlation between different castes in colonial Latin America has been driven by particular social values, perceptual identities and ideological fundamentals. Schwartz discusses professor Kuznesofs approach based on the thesis that the determination of race is substantially motivated by gender. The issue of gender is also elucidated by Jesus F. de la Teja and Ross Frank who purport that Spanish colonizers have made use of their social control theory and practice designed to enforce conformity to idealized gender. Another benefit of Schwartzs research lies in stating that the early contacts between Europeans and aboriginal peoples and the treatment of their offspring are the most significant preconditions to the systems of hierarchy. In view of the aforesaid judgment, it should be implied that both knowledge and experience of multi-cultural interactions have truly incited Spanish colonizers to maintain their dominance with the help of sociedad de castas. The author has managed to explain that a race or ethnicity should not be apprehended as a caste itself. He has demonstrated how the social position of various peoples including mestizos and creoles has been constantly changed due to various factors. Schwartz argues that the issue of gender is utterly dependent on a particular race and does not solely affect the sociedad de castas. In other words, a representative of a particular gender may change the caste only if his racial status allows him to do so. Furthermore, it might be relevant to ascertain that Schwartzs study has a number of limitations as well. They are the following: Stuart B. Schwartz takes into account primarily investigations of professor Kuznesof. The authors exclusive emphasis on critical analysis of Kuznesofs approach makes his study less substantiated and reliable. The author of Colonial Identities and the Sociedad de Castas has failed to elaborate on the issues of legitimacy and social responsibilities of castes representatives. Apart from the above, it should be stated that there are several issues in the domain of multi-racial and multi-ethnic societies of colonial Latin America than need to be investigated further. The first problem includes the question of identity and determination. In this connection, it is proposed to examine how various ethnic groups being controlled in the frames of the sociedad de castas have personally identified their social statuses. Also, it should be detected whether the peoples aspirations to self-determination and independence have ever shaped the sociedad de castas. The second problem involves the matter of race and its social components because Schwartz has failed to elucidate the concept of race as the social phenomenon. The third issue that needs to be clarified is the concept of marriage and its influence on the sociedad de castas. According to Frank Salomon, marriage constitutes an integral part of the native societies political economy. In the final analysis, it is possible to lead to a conclusion that Schwartzs study of racial and class determinants facilitates the understanding of the colonial world and its system of complex relationships which is called the sociedad de castas. Buy custom Colonial Identities and the Sociedad de Castas essay

Making the First Call to Your College Roommate

Making the First Call to Your College Roommate You just received your roommates name and contact information. Youre a little nervous, a little excited. Your mind is buzzing . . . where to start first? Facebook? Google? Your friends? Just how much cyber stalking is appropriate when it comes to someone youll be living with? If you really want to get to know your new roomie youll have to go a little more old school and pick up the phone. How You Most Likely Were Matched You have been paired with your roommate for a wide range of reasons: some may be left to chance, others may be strategic. Smaller schools have more time and resources to pair roommates personally based on questionnaires and other information. Larger schools may use software to match you. You may have been purposefully placed with your roommate to expose both of you to new backgrounds, experiences, and personalities; you may have been paired with your roommate with lesser goals in mind. Either way, you now have the name of the person with whom you will (most likely!) live for the next nine months. Congrats! Before You Call There are a few things you should keep in mind before contacting your roommate for the first time. First and foremost, remember that both of you are likely nervous and excited about similar things: leaving home, starting college, having a roommate, figuring out your meal plans and where to buy books. This is a great place to start to connect. Second, before contacting your roommate, try to think about what you know your living style to be like. Keep in mind that this may be different than what you want your style to be like. Do you like a clean and organized room? Yes. Are you good at keeping it that way? No. Make sure you know how you actually are so that you can set realistic expectations for both of you. Try to be honest about your own patterns and what you know you need to feel balanced. College life is stressful, so if you know you need to go out dancing until 3:00 a.m. to relieve that stress, come up with a plan for how to handle returning home really late without waking your sleeping roommate. During the Call Try to remember that you dont need to work everything out during your first phone call or email. (Email is great, but you most definitely should try to connect via phone, if possible, before meeting on move-in day!) You can decide who brings the mini-fridge, the TV, etc., later. For the first phone call, do your best just to get to know the other person. Talk about his or her high school experience, goals for college, major, why you both picked the college you did, and/or what you are doing between now and when you start in the fall. While many roommates end up being great friends, dont put that expectation on yourself or your new roommate. But you should set a pattern of being friendly. Even if you end up living totally different lives once youre at school, its still important to be on friendly and respectful terms with your roommate. Lastly, and most importantly, expect to be surprised. This may sound scary at first but remember: you have focused on going to college for a long time. You want to be challenged with new ideas, interesting texts, and mind-blowing conversations. One of the most important lessons to learn about college is that this kind of true learning doesnt just happen in the classroom! It happens in the conversations that continue after class as you walk to the cafeteria. Your roommate may currently be living in a different country than you. Your roommate may seem to be totally different than the people you hung out with in high school. Your roommate may seem to be . . . just too different. Sure, this is scary, but its also a little exciting. This is your first college experience in many ways. You may not be on campus yet, but you are meeting someone who hopefully will be somewhere in the mass of students throwing their graduation caps with you in several years. You and your first-year roommate may not be best friends, but you undoubtedly will be a part of each others college experience. As long as youre honest and respectful with each other, things should be fine. So snoop on the internet as much as you like, spend a little time figuring out what your living style is, take a deep breath, relax, and have fun on your first phone call with your new roomie!

Hyperopia (eye defect) Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Hyperopia (eye defect) - Essay Example For example, in mild cases of this disorder eyes may focus without corrective lenses. In some other forms of hyperopia, eyeglasses or contact lenses can be prescribed. As a rule, new born children have some problems of hyoperopia (Tsubota, Boxer Wacher, Azar, and Koch, 2003). This can be explained by an abnormal in eyeball length. This disorder is characterized by inability of the retina to reflect light primary to changing into a focused image, which can lead to difficulty seeing of close objects (Eye Health: Presbyopia and Your Eyes, October, 2005). Different mistakes of vision can be explained in terms of hyperopia, for example a person can have from none to clear distance vision or blurry near vision (Edmiston). The brains of a child with hyperopia cannot identify sharp lines. Parents of these children cannot understand that the child has some problems at an early age. A child with hyperopia can have problems when focusing one's attention on a particular object. There is a lackin g of a child's ability identify images. Some serious cases of hyperopia prevent brains from merging the images identified by individual eyes. This can be explained by blurred images received from brains. ... This type of drops relaxes the accommodation. The patient's visual status can be determined with the help of hand-held instrument called a retinoscope. It is possible to measure a refractive error in units called diopters (D) (Chou, 2006.) This disease is also known as farsightedness, when a person can see distant objects clearly, but close objects as blurred ones. Individuals suffering hyperopia can experience it in a different manner. Hyperopia is more characterized as eye disorder, but not as a disease. On the basis of recent researches and studies it is possible to find out different characteristics of this eye disorder. For example, the scientists have claimed that age of people and their gender influences development of this disorder. Female gender patients are more subjected to hyperopia. Other scientists claim that males are more subjected to this eye disorder. Actually, it is relevant to refer to the reliability of data and statistics used to rely on the results of the studi es. In accordance with findings of 2010: â€Å"farsightedness commonly affects people during middle age - during their 40s or 50s, but it may also be present from birth. The majority of children who are born with some degree of hyperopia tend to get better as they get older and their eyes develop† (Nordqvist, 2010). The National Health Service (NHS), UK, underlines that 13.2% of British people suffer this disorder, though they are 20-25 years aged. If to consider hyperopia from a physiological point of view, it is possible to see that there are the following features, which are appropriate for people suffering from it. The cornea is a front part of an eye that transmits the light and focuses it in the eye. The lens is so-called transparent structures in the